Bioprinted Organ Prototypes

Authors

  • Helena Novak Author
  • Oscar Novak Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19542645

Keywords:

organ bioprinting; bioprinted kidney; liver tissue engineering; cardiac bioprinting; vascularised constructs; organ-on-chip; transplantation; biofabrication

Abstract

Bioprinted organ prototypes -- centimetre-scale, multicellular, vascularised constructs that replicate the architecture and partial function of human organs -- represent the frontier of biofabrication. Unlike tissue patches or scaffold implants, organ prototypes aim to recapitulate organ-level complexity: multiple cell types in spatially defined compartments, hierarchical vasculature from arterioles to capillaries, innervation for sensory and motor function, and integrated drainage (lymphatic, biliary, urinary). No bioprinted organ has achieved full transplant-grade function, but prototype-scale constructs have demonstrated partial organ function in vitro and short-term engraftment in vivo for kidney, liver, heart, and lung tissues. We present the Organ Prototype Assessment Framework (OPAF), evaluating five bioprinted organ prototypes -- kidney nephron units, liver lobule modules, cardiac ventricle patches, lung alveolar-capillary interfaces, and pancreatic islet constructs -- across five functional benchmarks (structural fidelity, vascularisation, organ-specific function, engraftment viability, and scalability to human dimensions). Our Organ Prototype Maturity Score (OPMS) measures the distance from each prototype to transplant-grade functionality. Pancreatic islet constructs achieve the highest OPMS (0.918) because islets are the simplest organ unit -- small, avascular-tolerant, and functionally defined by a single output (insulin secretion) -- while kidney nephron prototypes score lowest (0.812) due to the nephron's extraordinary architectural complexity.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-14

How to Cite

Bioprinted Organ Prototypes. (2026). International Archives of Biomedicine, Life Sciences and Bioengineering, 3(2), 74-82. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19542645

Similar Articles

1-10 of 64

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.